![]() ![]() Proper pre-election logic and accuracy testing would have easily caught both problems, said Daniel Lopresti, a Lehigh University computer scientist on the county election commission. ![]() One poll judge called the touch screens “garbage,” and some voters who registered complaints in emails obtained by The Associated Press in a public records request said their votes were assigned to the wrong candidates - an error known as “vote-flipping.” Others worried about future malfunctions triggering long lines.Īccording to state certification documents, voters require triple the amount of time on average to navigate ES&S ballot-marking machines when compared with filling out hand-marked ballots and running them through optical scanners.ĮS&S blamed the Northampton County debacle on human error. The other problem: miscalibrated touch screens on about a third of the county’s 320 machines. A manual recount of the paper voting records settled the election. Only absentee ballot votes registered electronically for the candidate. ![]() Northampton County, on Pennsylvania’s eastern edge, became ground zero last November in the debate over ballot-marking devices when its newly purchased ES&S ExpressVote XLs failed in two different ways.įirst, a ballot programming error prevented votes cast for one of three candidates in a judge’s race from registering in the bar codes used to count the vote. “When we give them a paper ballot, the very first thing they say to us is, ‘We’re going back in time,’” he said. Michael Anderson, elections director for Pennsylvania’s Lebanon County, said “voters want it.” The county offers all voters both machine- and hand-marked ballots. They like them because the touch screens are familiar to voters, looking and feeling like what they’ve been using for nearly two decades, and they can use one voting method for everyone. The state is banning bar codes from ballot-marking voting machines beginning in 2021.īut some election officials see ballot-marking devices as improvements over paperless touch screens, which were used by 27 percent of voters in 2018. It is a stance also shared by Colorado, a national leader in election security. voters used in 20 and will again rely on in November. It’s an idea supported by a 2018 National Academies of Sciences report that favors hand-marked ballots tallied by optical scanners, which 70 percent of U.S. “There are a huge number of reasons to reject today’s ballot-marking devices - except for limited use as assistive devices for those unable to mark a paper ballot themselves,” says Doug Jones, a University of Iowa election security expert.Ĭritics say currently available ballot-marking devices undermine the very idea of retaining a paper record. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |